![]() Lastly, the Omni Group could create a "lite" version of OmniFocus for the App Store and sell both an iPhone and desktop OmniFocus Lite for under $50. ![]() Or they might provide HTML 5 (Gears-like) offline Google Tasks web app with synchronization support for Safari. Google might finally provide an API for Google Tasks, allowing iOS client development. Lastly, and least likely, Jobs might decide he doesn't totally hate task managers after all. Alternatively, Apple could forget it hates its customers, and finally put a bullet through iCal (sadly, will require 10.7). If Apple were to provide OS X App Store developers with a standard way to synchronize to iOS devices I'd expect a great solution. There are at least three ways the logjam could break.Īpple's OS X app store could reenergize the flagging OS X desktop, and new desktop products might appear at better price points. I do, however, grit my teeth every time I use Toodledo's web client, especially if I need to search for something. The best option is still the combination of Appigo's ToDo.app and Toodledo's web service I pay for both. (Corrected from original - see comments.) Remember the Milk has a bad reputation as a business partner, their iTunes ratings are poor (?reliability), they are relatively costly at $25/year, and there's no data freedom.The web app search is field specific and so almost useless. Toodledo's own iPhone/web solution is limited by their complex (and, sadly, ugly) web app.The best option is to sync with Toodledo's web app, but that app has a different data model than ToDo.app. Appigo's ToDo.app doesn't have a robust and reliable web or desktop solution and lacks data freedom.Their iTunes ratings continue to decline. Things has reliability issues, is too expensive and doesn't support data freedom.At a lower price point though I'd seriously consider them despite the complex. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |